Just received word and it has been confirmed: Amy Lane resigned last night following the meeting.
She will be greatly missed. I think she was an extremely valuable asset to our administration team and to our children.
This hurts tremendously.
This blog will serve as a communication tool on what is taking place while I serve on the Cloudcroft School Board. I will attempt to keep everyone updated and informed to the best of my ability. This blog is my personal opinion and does not reflect the feelings of the entire board.
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
4-day week passes
The 4-day school week passed last night by a 3-1 vote (Gerold Green voted nay). As I said last night before the vote my decision was a last second one. The parents, teachers and community members who provided us with information (both for and against) was incredible. I really appreciate all the information we received and all of the support we received.
On May 9, I made the second and voted in favor of the 4-day school week. After receiving word that we didn't do it the proper way I began thinking perhaps this wasn't the way we needed to go. In the end I felt we needed to try whatever we could to make sure we kept the doors open and our kids getting an education. I appreciate everyone's opinions and comments regarding this issue.
I made my decision and I will stand by it. If I am wrong I will be more than willing to stand up and say "I was wrong." I am big enough and man enough to do that. I hope that we don't regret having made this decision. I think our district has already suffered enough pain and suffering and we need to work together toward a successful and exciting 2011-2012 school year.
I would like to thank all the people who provided information, gave us insight and spent hours researching material and forwarding it to the board. Your help was greatly appreciated and valued.
On May 9, I made the second and voted in favor of the 4-day school week. After receiving word that we didn't do it the proper way I began thinking perhaps this wasn't the way we needed to go. In the end I felt we needed to try whatever we could to make sure we kept the doors open and our kids getting an education. I appreciate everyone's opinions and comments regarding this issue.
I made my decision and I will stand by it. If I am wrong I will be more than willing to stand up and say "I was wrong." I am big enough and man enough to do that. I hope that we don't regret having made this decision. I think our district has already suffered enough pain and suffering and we need to work together toward a successful and exciting 2011-2012 school year.
I would like to thank all the people who provided information, gave us insight and spent hours researching material and forwarding it to the board. Your help was greatly appreciated and valued.
Wednesday, June 15, 2011
My response to People Concerned about Cloudcroft Municipal Schools blog post
Margo. Just to clear the record I have yet to receive the packets with the petitions you mention. I received an email from from John Manford on Monday - I was at the School Board Law Conference all weekend. I did email him back Monday and tell him I would attempt to call him. I got busy reviewing information that Amanda Woeger and Mike Nivison sent me and didn't make contact. That could be an excuse, but I do actually listen to what people have to say - whether I like what they say or not. I would still welcome the opportunity to review the material, however, I can tell you after talking to numerous people at the law conference and some additional friends there is no way to simply fire our superintendent - as the petitions request. I know that is not the answer people want, but right now that is the reality people must face. That doesn't mean I'm spineless or don't have the guts to speak up - that means I want to ensure we aren't paying two superintendents and an assistant.
Our "assistant superintendent," which is a misnomer because she actually was our director of curriculum and testing, has been moved to the special ed director. This was done last week.
People also need to take a hard look at HB 212 to better understand the place school board members are in with regard to what they are entitled to do.
Tonight (Wednesday, June 15) I posted on my Facebook page and my blog asking for feedback on the 4 day school week. I am asking for people's feedback because I want everyone to understand that by remaining with a 5 day school week we will be forced to RIF two or three additional teachers - which I think is also a bad situation. As I've said previously this is a bad sandwich and everyone has to take a bite ... we just have to figure out which bad taste EVERYONE wants in their mouths.
Do we have hard facts to support the savings we hope to gain? NO. (I don't think any school district can realistically give us those facts because not all districts face the severe winters we do. Last year we received a federal stimulus grant for $150K that covered our propane ... this year that grant isn't coming.)
Do we know if this will cause us to lose children? NO. (I will tell you there is rumor Alamo and numerous other schools in NM are looking at going to a 4 day week. I can also add that more than one Alamo parent has expressed interest in bringing their child up to Cloudcroft because of the potential 4 day week.)
And lastly ... Is your school board going to make a decision not everyone likes? YES. Answering any other way would be foolish. At this point, we must make decisions that will not be popular. In my opinion, we are ALL in a lose-lose situation and worst of all our children are going to be affected ... regardless of whether we have a 4 or 5 day week or we have a superintendent and asst. superintendent.
http://cmsbearsinfo.blogspot.com/2011/06/special-school-board-meeting-scheduled.html
Our "assistant superintendent," which is a misnomer because she actually was our director of curriculum and testing, has been moved to the special ed director. This was done last week.
People also need to take a hard look at HB 212 to better understand the place school board members are in with regard to what they are entitled to do.
Tonight (Wednesday, June 15) I posted on my Facebook page and my blog asking for feedback on the 4 day school week. I am asking for people's feedback because I want everyone to understand that by remaining with a 5 day school week we will be forced to RIF two or three additional teachers - which I think is also a bad situation. As I've said previously this is a bad sandwich and everyone has to take a bite ... we just have to figure out which bad taste EVERYONE wants in their mouths.
Do we have hard facts to support the savings we hope to gain? NO. (I don't think any school district can realistically give us those facts because not all districts face the severe winters we do. Last year we received a federal stimulus grant for $150K that covered our propane ... this year that grant isn't coming.)
Do we know if this will cause us to lose children? NO. (I will tell you there is rumor Alamo and numerous other schools in NM are looking at going to a 4 day week. I can also add that more than one Alamo parent has expressed interest in bringing their child up to Cloudcroft because of the potential 4 day week.)
And lastly ... Is your school board going to make a decision not everyone likes? YES. Answering any other way would be foolish. At this point, we must make decisions that will not be popular. In my opinion, we are ALL in a lose-lose situation and worst of all our children are going to be affected ... regardless of whether we have a 4 or 5 day week or we have a superintendent and asst. superintendent.
http://cmsbearsinfo.blogspot.com/2011/06/special-school-board-meeting-scheduled.html
School board meeting - June 20
Come and give your opinion on the 4-day school week. Whether you are for or against it ... I NEED YOUR HELP.
I have my opinion, but I'm listening to ensure we make the right decision for our students! I NEED YOUR HELP!
If you can't attend, please shoot me a message - either via Facebook message, via my email address: voteforarlan@gmail.com or via a post on my blog: voteforarlan.blogspot.com. We need your names - whether for or against. You're opinion is valued! If you think you don't need to speak up then a decision might be made that you won't like!
I NEED YOUR FEEDBACK NOW!
I have my opinion, but I'm listening to ensure we make the right decision for our students! I NEED YOUR HELP!
If you can't attend, please shoot me a message - either via Facebook message, via my email address: voteforarlan@gmail.com or via a post on my blog: voteforarlan.blogspot.com. We need your names - whether for or against. You're opinion is valued! If you think you don't need to speak up then a decision might be made that you won't like!
I NEED YOUR FEEDBACK NOW!
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
Small schools could be assimilated
Not really a good idea for a bill, but at least someone is looking at making some changes.
Small school districts could be assimilated
Alamogordo Daily News
By Milan Simonich, Santa Fe Bureau
By Milan Simonich, Santa Fe Bureau
Posted: 01/30/2011 12:00:00 AM MST
SANTA FE The high plains village of Mosquero in northeastern New Mexico has a school district with 43 students.
A crowded classroom in Albuquerque has more kids.
Roy has a school district, too. It has 51 students. Wagon Mound has 71 in its district, House 79 and Des Moines 97.
Isolation, geography, a weak economy and tradition are reasons that places too small to appear on many state maps have school districts.
All told, 49 of New Mexico's 89 school districts have fewer than 1,000 students.
State Sen. Stephen Fischmann, D-Mesilla Park, has introduced a bill to close each of those small districts. His proposal, SB 80, is not as radical as it may sound, Fischmann said.
"I'm not in favor of closing schools. That's not what this is about," he said during an interview last week.
Rather, Fischmann's idea is to shrink the number of districts, combine resources and better serve students. Otherwise, he said, the sacred cows of funding formulas and entrenched districts go on, but student achievement does not go up.
Fischmann, who has a master's degree in business administration from UCLA, spent his career with Levi Strauss. He calls himself an outsider when it comes to schools, but says those inside may be so accustomed to doing things the same way that opportunities are missed.
People who are in the trenches, running tiny districts, say Fischmann's idea to force consolidations has a certain appeal.
"It looks good on paper," said Robert Cobos, superintendent of the Carrizozo Municipal Schools, a district with 175 students.
Carrizozo, in Lincoln County, is among a cluster of small school districts. Hondo has 169 students, Corona 83 and Capitan a whopping 516.
But put them all together and you still would not have a district of 1,000 students. Send every student to Ruidoso or a centralized campus and you would spend a lot of time on the bus but have no guarantee that anybody would learn more.
Cobos said the small districts in his area probably would not save much money even if they were all under a single umbrella with one superintendent instead of four.
His Carrizozo district has three schools serving students in grades kindergarten through 12, but it has only one principal. Cobos is the only administrator other than the principal. He said he performs the jobs of activities director, budget analyst, transportation director and superintendent, all in one.
"We're skeletal," he said.
Shirley Crawford, superintendent of the Capitan schools, runs an operation that is just as lean.
Her district, with more than twice as many students as Carrizozo, used to have three principals, one each for the elementary, middle and high school. She reduced the administrative tier this year to one principal for all three schools.
"We had cut the classroom as far as we could," she said.
Now, with just one principal racing between three buildings, each school gets a bit less attention.
"He walks seven miles a day," she said of the principal, Jerrett Perry.
Crawford said the paperwork demands on administrators had exploded in the last 15 years, given all the federal and state guidelines to answer for. Still, she is out of the office and accessible, even supervising two hours of lunch each day so her teachers have more time to do their jobs.
Fischmann said his goal is not necessarily to cut expenses in small districts. Redirecting resources is another option.
He said this might mean a combined district could eliminate a couple of superintendent's jobs and add more teachers to put greater emphasis on kids and classrooms.
Crawford said even that system would have drawbacks. People in Capitan can meet with her just about any time they like to discuss a problem or idea. A superintendent responsible for schools in three or four towns would spend a lot of time driving and a lot less making schools better, she said.
Cobos said a merger of districts would not advance the Carrizozo schools in ways that he thinks are important.
"I'd love to have a band," he said. "We don't have enough kids."
Fischmann, who is on the Senate Education Committee, said his idea to shutter small districts is unpopular with many legislators. He admits he brought the bill because the Las Cruces district, with an enrollment of more than 24,000, is the only school system in his legislative district. That means he faces no political pressures from constituents.
Slightly annoyed with him, he said, is the chairwoman of the Senate Education Committee. That is Democrat Cynthia Nava, superintendent of the Gadsden Independent School District, an operation more than large enough for her to spend the 60-day legislative session in Santa Fe.
Nava has not yet scheduled a hearing for Fischmann's bill, but he said it is plain she is no fan of it.
Asked about its chances of receiving approval, Fischmann did not hesitate. "Slim," he said.
"But this doesn't have to pass to do some good by pushing the discussion. It's just such a hot potato politically."
Santa Fe Bureau Chief Milan Simonich can be reached at msimonich@tnmnp.com or (505) 820-6898. His blog is at http://elpasotimes.typepad.com/newmexico.
Saturday, January 8, 2011
Meet the Candidates forum
The next (unofficial) "Meet The Candidates" forums are at 7 p.m. on these dates: Jan. 11 - Mayhill - community center; Jan. 12 - Weed school gym kitchen; Jan.13 - Pinion Extension Bldg. and Jan. 18 - Timburon community center. The school board will announce the "official" ones at their meeting on Monday night at 6 p.m.
Come out and meet the folks who will be on the school board for the next four (4) years.
Come out and meet the folks who will be on the school board for the next four (4) years.
Sunday, December 26, 2010
Support in Weed, Timberon and Mayhill
Need my supporters out in those outer-lying areas to help me.
I'm trying to get out and ask everyone for their vote, however, with just over a month before the election I'm afraid I'll run out of time and they will go with the incumbent because they haven't been asked for their vote. I need EVERYONE'S vote on Feb 1!
Remember I'm a parent with two daughters in our school system, I know how important our teachers, our programs and our students are to all of us.
You can direct people who don't know me to this blog or you can have them email me with questions at voteforarlan@gmail.com.
I'm trying to get out and ask everyone for their vote, however, with just over a month before the election I'm afraid I'll run out of time and they will go with the incumbent because they haven't been asked for their vote. I need EVERYONE'S vote on Feb 1!
Remember I'm a parent with two daughters in our school system, I know how important our teachers, our programs and our students are to all of us.
You can direct people who don't know me to this blog or you can have them email me with questions at voteforarlan@gmail.com.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)